From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: Packet timestamps (was: Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20) Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:38:44 +0100 Message-ID: <200703061538.45049.dada1@cosmosbay.com> References: <200609181850.22851.ak@suse.de> <4514147D.5040803@hp.com> <20070306132551.GB8412@tentacle.sectorb.msk.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen , Alexey Kuznetsov , David Miller , hawk@diku.dk, harry@atmos.washington.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rick Jones To: "Vladimir B. Savkin" Return-path: Received: from pfx2.jmh.fr ([194.153.89.55]:39661 "EHLO pfx2.jmh.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965879AbXCFOir (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:38:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20070306132551.GB8412@tentacle.sectorb.msk.ru> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 06 March 2007 14:25, Vladimir B. Savkin wrote: > }, > + { > + .ctl_name = NET_CORE_ACCURATE_TIMESTAMPS, > + .procname = "accurate_timestamps", > + .data = &sysctl_accurate_timestamps, > + .maxlen = sizeof(int), > + .mode = 0644, > + .proc_handler = &proc_dointvec > + }, > { .ctl_name = 0 } > }; > > > May I ask about integrating this or a similar solution for those > like me who values routing performance (with bind9 running) over > minor convinience of having tcpdump always display accurate > timestamps? > Quite frankly I dont like this patch : 1) Fix applications, do not bloat kernel. 2) "accurate_timestamps" is misleading. Should be "disable_timestamps"