From: Mithlesh Thukral <mithlesh@netxen.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, amitkale@netxen.com,
netxenproj@linsyssoft.com, rob@netxen.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] NetXen: Make driver use multiple PCI functions
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 18:17:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703081817.57109.mithlesh@netxen.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45ED4E81.6010408@garzik.org>
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 16:50, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Linsys Contractor Mithlesh Thukral wrote:
> > NetXen: Make driver use multiple PCI functions.
> > This patch will make NetXen driver work with multiple PCI functions. This
> > will make the usage of memory resources as well as interrupts more
> > independent among different functions which results in better throughput.
> > This change has been done after the multiport capable firmware related
> > changes are already there in the NetXen's driver in Linux.
> >
> > Signed-off by: Mithlesh Thukral <mithlesh@netxen.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic.h | 126 ++---
> > drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_ethtool.c | 80 +--
> > drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_hdr.h | 8
> > drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_hw.c | 213 ++++++--
> > drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_hw.h | 18
> > drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_init.c | 115 +---
> > drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_isr.c | 80 +--
> > drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_main.c | 523 ++++++++++-----------
> > drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_niu.c | 27 -
> > drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_phan_reg.h | 125 -----
> > 10 files changed, 631 insertions(+), 684 deletions(-)
>
> applied 1-3 to #upstream (2.6.22)
hi Gurus,
Please bear with my poor understanding about the kernel development process. I
have the following query:
1. We have sent these 3 patches which are have lined up for 2.6.22 kernel (as
mentioned above).
2. The tree which is in netdev#upstream doesnt have these 3 above mentioned
patches.
I need to send some patches now. My query is :
1. If i send the patches with respect to current netdev#upstream and if they
are accepted, will the 3 patches which are applied for #upstream(2.6.22)
not break (i mean not apply cleanly).
OR
I should send the patches with respect to current netdev#upstream tree + above
3 patches, so that these 3 patches apply cleanly when 2.6.22 development
cycle begins.
Please advice me how to proceed on this.
Thanks,
Mithlesh Thukral
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-08 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-05 12:53 [PATCH 1/3] NetXen: Make driver use multiple PCI functions Linsys Contractor Mithlesh Thukral
2007-03-06 11:20 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-03-08 12:47 ` Mithlesh Thukral [this message]
2007-03-08 13:12 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200703081817.57109.mithlesh@netxen.com \
--to=mithlesh@netxen.com \
--cc=amitkale@netxen.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netxenproj@linsyssoft.com \
--cc=rob@netxen.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).