From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
To: "Yuriy N\. Shkandybin" <jura@netams.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"bugme-daemon\@kernel-bugs\.osdl\.org"
<bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8132] New: pptp server lockup in ppp_asynctty_receive()
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 11:21:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070309102143.GD1662@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01a001c76226$c956b290$9b01a8c0@Empty>
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 11:40:04AM +0300, Yuriy N. Shkandybin wrote:
...
> I already have
> CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y
> # CONFIG_4KSTACKS is not set
> .config is at
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=10660&action=view
> Also all information i've provied was recieved by serial console and it's
> not hand writing.
Maybe you cut too much (lines before a bug could be meaningful
- if there are some secret data - try to mask only them).
And there is no real lockdep diagnose, so I wasn't sure.
Dump registers at the end looks incomplete (no ESP info), too.
So, this all made me think - it's cut because it's from the screen.
Very sorry!!!
> I've checked logs and right before lockup there is oops in syslog
> Mar 5 21:50:44 vpn2 skb_under_panic: text:c02248a2 len:207 put:1
As a matter of fact the first bug is the most interesting
and everything after could be only some aftereffect.
This skb_under_panic message could change all diagnose:
it's not necessarily a locking problem.
On the other hand this could be even harder to diagnose
than locking...
> head:db96e22c data:db96e22b tail:db96e2fa end:db96e82c dev:<NULL>
> Mar 5 21:50:44 vpn2 ------------[ cut here ]------------
Why?! We don't even know if there was some config pending here.
> Mar 5 21:50:44 vpn2 kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:112!
...
> Another thing - when i`ve changed HZ from 100 too 300 there is no such
> lockups for few days.
You wrote it had been since several kernel releases, so it
shouldn't be the case, but anyway - it would be interesting
to check HZ 100 but with clean and more current kernel version
e.g. 2.6.21-rc3.
Thanks & regards,
Jarek P.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-09 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200703052226.l25MQUk4011469@fire-2.osdl.org>
2007-03-05 23:13 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 8132] New: pptp server lockup in ppp_asynctty_receive() Andrew Morton
2007-03-08 8:45 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-09 8:40 ` Yuriy N. Shkandybin
2007-03-09 10:21 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2007-03-09 13:10 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-03-19 7:49 ` Yuriy N. Shkandybin
2007-03-28 8:19 ` [PATCH] ppp_generic: lockdep warning Re: [Bug 8132] New: pptp server lockup Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070309102143.GD1662@ff.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=jura@netams.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).