From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] iproute2 2.6.20-070313 Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:23:48 +0100 Message-ID: <200703141223.48927.arekm@maven.pl> References: <20070313151549.332004c9@freekitty> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070313151549.332004c9@freekitty> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 13 of March 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > This is an experimental to the iproute2 command set. > > The version number includes the kernel version to denote what feature= s are > supported. The same source should build on older systems, but obvious= ly the > newer kernel features won't be available. As much as possible, this p= ackage > tries to be source compatible across releases. > > It can be downloaded from: > =20 > http://developer.osdl.org/dev/iproute2/download/iproute2-2.6.20-07031= 3.tar. >gz This patch http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg27506.html didn't make into upstream linux kernel it seems. The question is - are patches adding some functionality that's not in u= pstream=20 kernel accepted? There is one wrr patch for iproute floating around that I'm thinking ab= out. --=20 Arkadiusz Mi=B6kiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/