From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Graf Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] [IPv6]: Use rtnl registration interface Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:43:22 +0100 Message-ID: <20070321124322.GW521@postel.suug.ch> References: <20070321000553.070942307@lsx.localdomain> <20070321000710.549330036@lsx.localdomain> <20070321.020137.109232015.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@" Return-path: Received: from postel.suug.ch ([194.88.212.233]:47402 "EHLO postel.suug.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751727AbXCUMnD (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:43:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070321.020137.109232015.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org * YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ 2007-03-21 02:01 > In article <20070321000710.549330036@lsx.localdomain> (at Wed, 21 Mar 2007 01:06:03 +0100), Thomas Graf says: > > > -static int > > -inet6_rtm_deladdr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, void *arg) > > +static int nl_addr_del(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, void *arg) > > { > > struct ifaddrmsg *ifm; > > I'm rather not favor changing function names here... I was trying to achieve consistent naming among all message handlers. All these functions are static with a single reference.