From: "Denys" <denys@visp.net.lb>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: iproute2-2.6.20-070313 bug ?
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:35:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070322133538.M93466@visp.net.lb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46028335.3030402@trash.net>
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:23:01 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote
> Please don't remove CCs.
>
> Denys wrote:
> > 1024kb (if i am not wrong 1Mbyte) is huge?
> >
> > For me it is ok, as soon as i have RAM.
>
> Its not about the memory, its about the resulting queueing delay.
> If you buffer packets for 64 seconds the sender will retransmit
> them and you end up wasting bandwidth.
>
> > Another thing, it is working well
> > with old tc. Just really if i have plenty of RAM's and i want 32second
> > buffer, why i cannot have that, and if i see it is really possible before?
>
> I know it worked before. But I can't think of a reason why anyone
> would want a buffer that large. Why do you want to queue packets
> for up to 64 seconds?
Seems i misunderstand how it works. If i am not wrong, till buffer available,
bandwidth will be given on "peakrate" speed, and when buffer is empty - on
"rate" speed. I am wrong?
At least it was working like this before.
--
Virtual ISP S.A.L.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-22 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-21 18:00 iproute2-2.6.20-070313 bug ? Denys
2007-03-22 11:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-22 12:46 ` Denys
2007-03-22 13:09 ` Patrick McHardy
[not found] ` <20070322131245.M85528@visp.net.lb>
2007-03-22 13:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-22 13:35 ` Denys [this message]
[not found] ` <20070322132637.M88445@visp.net.lb>
2007-03-22 13:43 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-22 13:47 ` Denys
2007-03-22 13:26 ` Denys
2007-03-22 17:12 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-22 17:14 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-26 18:49 ` more... iproute2/htb/whatever critical " Denys
2007-03-27 15:10 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-27 15:18 ` Denys
2007-03-27 16:00 ` Denys
2007-03-27 16:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-28 17:38 ` another " Denys
2007-03-28 23:55 ` Denys
2007-03-29 10:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-03-31 2:26 ` more iproute2 issues (not critical) Denys
2007-03-31 2:31 ` Denys
2007-03-31 14:16 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-04 0:03 ` one more... iproute commands lockup whole system Denys
2007-04-04 1:10 ` jamal
2007-04-04 1:39 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-04 2:09 ` jamal
2007-04-04 2:11 ` Denys
2007-04-04 10:55 ` jamal
2007-04-04 12:56 ` Denys
2007-04-04 14:10 ` jamal
2007-04-04 14:35 ` Denys
2007-04-04 14:13 ` HTB/act_mirred problem [was: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system] Patrick McHardy
2007-04-04 14:33 ` jamal
2007-04-04 14:50 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-05 1:33 ` jamal
2007-04-04 13:36 ` one more... iproute commands lockup whole system Patrick McHardy
2007-04-04 13:58 ` jamal
2007-04-04 14:07 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-04 14:30 ` jamal
2007-04-04 14:39 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-04-05 2:14 ` jamal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070322133538.M93466@visp.net.lb \
--to=denys@visp.net.lb \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).