netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>,
	nikb@webmaster.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Established connections hash function
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:50:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070328155047.4112fb47.dada1@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p73y7lh316u.fsf@bingen.suse.de>

On 28 Mar 2007 16:14:17 +0200
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> TCP tends to be initialized early before there is anything
> good in the entropy pool.
> 
> static void init_std_data(struct entropy_store *r)
> {
>         struct timeval tv;
>         unsigned long flags;
> 
>         spin_lock_irqsave(&r->lock, flags);
>         r->entropy_count = 0;
>         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&r->lock, flags);
> 
>         do_gettimeofday(&tv);
>         add_entropy_words(r, (__u32 *)&tv, sizeof(tv)/4);
>         add_entropy_words(r, (__u32 *)utsname(),
>                           sizeof(*(utsname()))/4);
> }
> 
> utsname is useless here because it runs before user space has 
> a chance to set it. The only truly variable thing is the 
> boot time, which can be guessed with the ns part being brute forced.
> 
> To make it secure you would need to do regular rehash like
> the routing cache which would pick up true randomness on the first
> rehash.

Good point, but :

1) We can now use "struct timespec" to get more bits in init_std_data()

2) tcp ehash salt is initialized at first socket creation, not boot time. Maybe we have more available entropy at this point.

3) We dont want to be 'totally secure'. We only want to raise the level, and eventually see if we have to spend more time on this next year(s). AFAIK we had two different reports from people being hit by the flaw of previous hash. Not really a critical issue.

4) We could add a hard limit on the length of one chain. Even if the bad guys discover a flaw, it wont hurt too much.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-28 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-22 15:39 RFC: Established connections hash function Nikolaos D. Bougalis
2007-03-22 15:52 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-22 17:32   ` Nikolaos D. Bougalis
2007-03-22 18:21     ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-22 19:44       ` Nikolaos D. Bougalis
2007-03-22 19:56         ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-22 20:53           ` Nikolaos D. Bougalis
2007-03-23  7:52             ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-22 20:58         ` David Miller
2007-03-22 22:03           ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-23  7:11             ` David Miller
2007-03-23  8:00               ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-23 18:46                 ` David Miller
2007-03-23  8:07           ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-23  8:17             ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-23  8:33               ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-23  9:10                 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-23 11:58             ` XOR hash beauty solved [Was: RFC: Established connections hash function] Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-23 12:51               ` Nikolaos D. Bougalis
2007-03-23 12:45             ` RFC: Established connections hash function Nikolaos D. Bougalis
2007-03-27 14:11 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-28  5:01   ` Nikolaos D. Bougalis
2007-03-28  6:29     ` David Miller
2007-03-28  9:29     ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-28 10:45       ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-28 14:14         ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-28 13:50           ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2007-03-28 14:52             ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-29  9:18               ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-03-28 14:17           ` RFC: Established connections hash function II Andi Kleen
2007-03-28 19:04           ` RFC: Established connections hash function David Miller
2007-03-28 20:12             ` Andi Kleen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-24 12:26 linux
2007-03-24 13:29 ` Evgeniy Polyakov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070328155047.4112fb47.dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikb@webmaster.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).