From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Gospodarek Subject: Re: [Bonding-devel] quick help with bonding? Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:48:15 -0400 Message-ID: <20070330024815.GA18574@gospo.rdu.redhat.com> References: <460BE5F0.7070606@nortel.com> <20070329181617.GA25770@gospo.rdu.redhat.com> <460C38EF.1080509@nortel.com> <4074.1175207458@death> <460C4EFE.6030505@nortel.com> <20070330003630.GA18319@gospo.rdu.redhat.com> <460C658C.7090803@nortel.com> <460C672F.404@nortel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andy Gospodarek , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh , bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To: Chris Friesen Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:36846 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1945915AbXC3Cth (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:49:37 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <460C672F.404@nortel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 07:26:07PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > Chris Friesen wrote: > > Andy Gospodarek wrote: > > > >> If you are looking for a decent source for patches you could consider > >> downloading the latest source-rpm from RHEL4/CentOS4. The bonding > >> driver in those releases have been updated to much later code and I can > >> tell you from personal experience they work pretty well. > > > I'm just about to load a kernel with a backport of bonding from 2.6.14. > > I'll try it out and if it doesn't help I'll try the RHEL4 one. > > No joy on the 2.6.14 backport, so I guess I'll try the RHEL4 route. > Ah, ok. I'm not too sure how different the 2.6.9 and 2.6.10 bonding code was, so it might take a little tweaking but I'm guessing there won't be significant differences.