From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add etun driver Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 11:44:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20070409.114402.45491411.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1176136628.8459.34.camel@johannes.berg> <461A70A5.8060607@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net, ebiederm@xmission.com, shemminger@linux-foundation.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, greearb@candelatech.com, dlezcano@fr.ibm.com, dim@openvz.org, containers@lists.osdl.org To: kaber@trash.net Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:40199 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753412AbXDISoC (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2007 14:44:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <461A70A5.8060607@trash.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Patrick McHardy Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:58:13 +0200 > It would be nice if someone would finally come up with a generic > interface based on netlink (RTM_NEWLINK) instead of adding yet > another couple of homegrown interfaces. I absolutely agree, using these ioctls and sysfs/procfs crap is totally insane given that we have a core mechanism for network configuration.