From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: cleanup extra semicolons Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:10:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20070420.171012.24611103.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20070403120009.4f3b41b7@freekitty> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: shemminger@linux-foundation.org Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:57881 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752875AbXDUAKJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:10:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070403120009.4f3b41b7@freekitty> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Stephen Hemminger Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 12:00:09 -0700 > Spring cleaning time... > > There seems to be a lot of places in the network code that have > extra bogus semicolons after conditionals. Most commonly is a > bogus semicolon after: switch() { } > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger Applied to net-2.6.22, thanks Stephen. I'm the main guilty party for the switch() statement cases. I saw someone use that convention long ago and I picked up on it for some reason. :-)