From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm take4 2/6] support multiple logging Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:29:02 -0700 Message-ID: <20070424012902.1089bc02.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <462605DC.2080804@bx.jp.nec.com> <462609D1.50300@bx.jp.nec.com> <20070419210813.a599c54f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <46288D11.4000801@bx.jp.nec.com> <20070420111526.01ad7f4c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <462DBC64.9070102@bx.jp.nec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mpm@selenic.com, davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Keiichi KII Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([65.172.181.25]:51991 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754590AbXDXI3V (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:29:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <462DBC64.9070102@bx.jp.nec.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:14:28 +0900 Keiichi KII wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:51:13 +0900 > > Keiichi KII wrote: > > > >>> I started to do some cleanups and fixups here, but abandoned it when it was > >>> all getting a bit large. > >>> > >>> Here are some fixes against this patch: > >> I'm going to fix my patches by following your reviews and send new patches > >> on the LKML and the netdev ML in a few days. > >> > > > > Well.. before you can finish this work we need to decide upon what the > > interface to userspace will be. > > > > - The miscdev isn't appropriate > > > > Why isn't miscdev appropriate? > We just shouldn't use miscdev for networking conventionally? > Yes it's rather odd, especially for networking. What does the miscdev _do_ anyway? Is it purely a target for the ioctls?