From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: shani.moideen@wipro.com
Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, pekkas@netcore.fi, jmorris@namei.org,
yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kaber@coreworks.de,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]:Replace with time_before in net/ipv4/ipip.c
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:19:38 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070425.011938.74750660.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1177480813.27118.17.camel@shani-win>
From: Shani Moideen <shani.moideen@wipro.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:30:13 +0530
> Replacing (jiffies - errtime < TIMEOUT) with time_before in net/ipv4/ipip.c
>
> thanks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shani Moideen <shani.moideen@wipro.com>
The test you are replacing actually gives a larger window
of acceptance than time_before() does.
It's been a long standing issue whether we should give up
this semantic advantage for the sake of code cleanliness
in the networking code.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-25 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-25 6:00 [PATCH]:Replace with time_before in net/ipv4/ipip.c Shani Moideen
2007-04-25 8:19 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070425.011938.74750660.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@coreworks.de \
--cc=kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pekkas@netcore.fi \
--cc=shani.moideen@wipro.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox