From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH][XFRM] export SAD info Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:18:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20070426.001850.55508944.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1177515761.9923.3.camel@localhost> <1177516490.9923.7.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: hadi@cyberus.ca Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:54787 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933227AbXDZHSm (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:18:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1177516490.9923.7.camel@localhost> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: jamal Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:54:50 -0400 > That patch has xfrm_state_num being mucked with; just ignore that bit. > I need to send a patch against net-2.6.22 and i will clean that up - > just need some feedback. > > Would it make sense to have those vars as u32 instead of unsigned int? I'm ambivalent, "unsigned int" happens to be 32-bit on every platform. So changing it would cause no harm :-)