From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [Security] [PATCH] infinite recursion in netlink Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:51:51 -0700 Message-ID: <20070426065151.GA4247@kroah.com> References: <20070426054842.GA18630@kroah.com> <20070426055259.GF2819@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <20070426062601.GH2819@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <20070425.233121.41192812.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: chrisw@sous-sol.org, security@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jaco@kroon.co.za, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, torvalds@linux-foundation.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([209.217.80.40]:41014 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933152AbXDZGzh (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:55:37 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070425.233121.41192812.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:31:21PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Chris Wright > Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:26:01 -0700 > > > Working fine here. Any chance you booted a stale kernel? > > If not, what's your nl_fib_input+0xe4. Any chance that's > > actually in nl_fib_lookup? > > I'm seriously hoping it's a stale kernel or similar, > because I can't account for it any other way :-) I did a 'make clean' and rebuilt 2.6.20.9 and I can't duplicate this again. Sorry for the false alarm, I have no idea what when wrong here. Glad the bug is really fixed. Now to push 2.6.20.9 out... again, sorry, greg k-h