From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Tourrilhes Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] wext: reduce inline abuse Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:15:17 -0700 Message-ID: <20070426171517.GA22667@bougret.hpl.hp.com> References: <20070424180732.371620000@sipsolutions.net> <20070424180849.651555000@sipsolutions.net> <20070426165032.GB22576@bougret.hpl.hp.com> <200704261903.27932.mb@bu3sch.de> Reply-To: jt-sDzT885Ts8HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Berg , David Miller , netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Michael Buesch Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200704261903.27932.mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 07:03:27PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > Sure, other people have different opinions on that, but I think > with my approach we get smallest code with good speed. Try with gcc-3.3 if you don't trust me. Your patch will produce bigger and slower code. Thanks. Jean