From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PROBLEM] Bonding driver in linux-2.6.21-rc6-mm1 Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:31:02 -0700 Message-ID: <20070428143102.f39299b5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <200704262058.33087.ve@vetienne.net> <200704272205.29131.ve@vetienne.net> <20070427153237.03f3b59c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200704282237.42753.ve@vetienne.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Stephen Hemminger , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Vincent ETIENNE Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([65.172.181.25]:56546 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030848AbXD1VbH convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 17:31:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200704282237.42753.ve@vetienne.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:37:42 +0200 Vincent ETIENNE wr= ote: > Le Saturday 28 April 2007 00:32:37 Andrew Morton, vous avez =E9crit=A0= : > > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:05:28 +0200 > > >=20 > > because we thought we'd fixed the rtnl_lock() problems in 2.6.21-rc= 7-mm2. > > Are you sure that log is from 2.6.21-rc7-mm2? >=20 >=20 > Yes. I have retested it another time ( for adding the small usb debug= =20 > message ) and get the same message a new time. >=20 > Maybe a tiny difference : only eth0 was setup during boot ( bond0 and= eth1 was=20 > not setup - volontary - to avoid problem that could interfere with u= sb ).=20 > Ony after having done my usb test, i have stopped the eth0, setup bon= d=20 > interface and restart bond interface and got the same problem with th= e same=20 > back trace. OK, thanks. > Is there anything i can do to get you more precise information ? I guess if you could provide us with your .config and a step-by-step re= cipe which developers should use to reproduce the problem then we should be = able to fix this pretty easily when someone finds the time to do so.