From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent ETIENNE Subject: Re: [PROBLEM] Bonding driver in linux-2.6.21-rc6-mm1 Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:37:42 +0200 Message-ID: <200704282237.42753.ve@vetienne.net> References: <200704262058.33087.ve@vetienne.net> <200704272205.29131.ve@vetienne.net> <20070427153237.03f3b59c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Stephen Hemminger , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Received: from mail1.vetienne.net ([87.98.219.23]:3610 "EHLO mail1.vetienne.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754757AbXD1Uqv convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:46:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070427153237.03f3b59c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Le Saturday 28 April 2007 00:32:37 Andrew Morton, vous avez =E9crit=A0: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:05:28 +0200 > > because we thought we'd fixed the rtnl_lock() problems in 2.6.21-rc7-= mm2. > Are you sure that log is from 2.6.21-rc7-mm2? Yes. I have retested it another time ( for adding the small usb debug=20 message ) and get the same message a new time. Maybe a tiny difference : only eth0 was setup during boot ( bond0 and e= th1 was=20 not setup - volontary - to avoid problem that could interfere with usb= ).=20 Ony after having done my usb test, i have stopped the eth0, setup bond=20 interface and restart bond interface and got the same problem with the = same=20 back trace. Is there anything i can do to get you more precise information ?