From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin LaHaise Subject: Re: [PATCH] TCP FIN gets dropped prematurely, results in ack storm Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 13:53:40 -0400 Message-ID: <20070501175340.GD1751@kvack.org> References: <20070501151354.GB1751@kvack.org> <20070501162050.GB21896@2ka.mipt.ru> <20070501164935.GC1751@kvack.org> <20070501174126.GA7577@2ka.mipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Evgeniy Polyakov Return-path: Received: from kanga.kvack.org ([66.96.29.28]:36772 "EHLO kanga.kvack.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755179AbXEARxt (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2007 13:53:49 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070501174126.GA7577@2ka.mipt.ru> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:41:28PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > Hmm, 2.2 machine in your test seems to behave incorrectly: I am aware of that. However, I think that the loss of certain packets and reordering can result in the same behaviour. What's more, is that this behaviour can occur in real deployed systems. "Be strict in what you send and liberal in what you accept." Both systems should be fixed, which is what I'm trying to do. -ben -- "Time is of no importance, Mr. President, only life is important." Don't Email: .