From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/20][BNX2]: Enhance the heartbeat. Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 10:44:35 -0700 Message-ID: <20070502104435.6471751e@localhost.localdomain> References: <46383B00.4080605@garzik.org> <20070502.002426.38687430.davem@davemloft.net> <4638400D.5010306@garzik.org> <20070502.005412.99176640.davem@davemloft.net> <46384540.6090509@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , mchan@broadcom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Return-path: Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:39063 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1766954AbXEBRtn (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2007 13:49:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <46384540.6090509@garzik.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 02 May 2007 04:01:04 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote: > David Miller wrote: > > From: Jeff Garzik > > Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 03:38:53 -0400 > > > >> * adding code for a situation that never occurs in the upstream kernel. > > > > What we could do is simply have Ingo carry this bnx2 driver patch in > > his -rt patch series, and then it will propagate into upstream as soon > > as it matters. > > Seems quite reasonable to me... > > Jeff Maybe if we used a hrtimer in this case, the -rt kernel wouldn't delay the timer. Seems like a real time system would have some mechanism to ensure a timer fires in time.