From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frederik Deweerdt Subject: Re: Strange soft lockup detected message (looks like spin_lock bug in pcnet32) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 16:33:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20070504143326.GD24769@slug> References: <20070503203143.GA8753@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <20070504141024.GB8753@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Lennart Sorensen Return-path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171]:21262 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755359AbXEDOe0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2007 10:34:26 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 44so658618uga for ; Fri, 04 May 2007 07:34:25 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070504141024.GB8753@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 10:10:24AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 04:31:43PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: [...] > Should line 2563 be a spin_lock_irqsave instead along with the > appropriate unluck later? IIRC, when you enable lockdep, it will complain about spinlocks used in an invalid context. Regards, Frederik > > -- > Len Sorensen > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >