netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Please pull 'upstream' branch of wireless-2.6
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 19:38:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070507233811.GB4245@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <463FB1A0.3070608@garzik.org>

On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 07:09:20PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> John W. Linville wrote:

> >Ivo van Doorn (1):
> >      Add 93cx6 eeprom library

> >Michael Wu (1):
> >      Add rtl8187 wireless driver

I presume these are the two parts you question.  (Just checking...)

> The normal development process is:
> 
> * commit new code to your repository
> * that goes into -mm for public testing and review
> * merge window opens
> * the code that has seen public testing and review goes upstream
> 
> The general idea is everything you want in 2.6.22 should be prepared and 
> in -mm BEFORE 2.6.21 is released, and the 2.6.22 merge window opens.
> 
> It's quite normal for fixes and minor changes to trickle in after the 
> push that follows the merge window opening.  But new drivers that have 
> not been through this process do not fall under "fixes and minor changes."
 
I agree whole-heartedly.

The whole mac80211 driver package (including rtl8187) has been in -mm
(and rawhide) for most of the 2.6.21 development cycle.  The rtl8187
driver in particular has been relatively stable for the past couple
of months ("3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)" since
7 March 2007), and it seems to work well.

> I also did not see any response to my "better as a single file driver" 
> suggestion.

Yes, I see that now.  Do you consider this a merge requirement?

My main concern pre-merge would be accidentally destabilizing the code
while stitching the files together.  Other than that, the suggestion
seems worthwhile.  However, I think Michael plans to expand the driver
to support rtl8180 and rtl8185.  This may factor into why he chose
to organize the code the way he has.

> So, I'll pull if you remove the two late additions.

Any chance that you find the comments above persuasive? :-)

John
-- 
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-08  0:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-07 17:51 Please pull 'upstream' branch of wireless-2.6 John W. Linville
     [not found] ` <20070507175121.GF5125-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
2007-05-07 21:15   ` Dan Williams
     [not found]     ` <1178572550.11805.7.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2007-05-07 22:51       ` John W. Linville
2007-05-08  8:49       ` Johannes Berg
2007-05-07 23:09   ` Jeff Garzik
     [not found]     ` <463FB1A0.3070608-o2qLIJkoznsdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2007-05-07 23:30       ` Michael Wu
2007-05-07 23:38     ` John W. Linville [this message]
2007-05-08 17:38   ` John W. Linville
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-29 18:30 Please pull 'upstream-fixes' " John W. Linville
2007-05-29 18:31 ` Please pull 'upstream' " John W. Linville
2007-05-30 14:03   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-08 17:39 John W. Linville
2007-05-09 22:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-02-02 21:27 Please pull "upstream-fixes" " John W. Linville
2007-02-02 21:28 ` Please pull "upstream" " John W. Linville
2007-02-07  0:06 ` Please pull "upstream-fixes" " Jeff Garzik
     [not found]   ` <45C917EF.1060307-o2qLIJkoznsdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2007-02-07 21:11     ` Please pull "upstream" " John W. Linville
     [not found]       ` <20070207211117.GC6109-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
2007-02-09 20:13         ` John W. Linville
     [not found]           ` <20070209201306.GA2580-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
2007-02-09 21:12             ` Jeff Garzik
2007-01-18 15:48 Please pull 'upstream-fixes' " John W. Linville
2007-01-18 15:49 ` Please pull 'upstream' " John W. Linville
2007-01-19  3:10   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-01-19  8:42     ` John W. Linville
2007-01-23  5:36   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-01-03  2:41 Please pull 'upstream-fixes' " John W. Linville
2007-01-03  2:42 ` Please pull 'upstream' " John W. Linville
2007-01-18 12:16   ` John W. Linville
2006-12-21  3:03 Please pull 'upstream-fixes' " John W. Linville
2006-12-21  3:05 ` Please pull 'upstream' " John W. Linville
2006-12-26 21:39   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-12-28  0:10     ` John W. Linville
2007-01-03  2:04       ` John W. Linville
2006-12-12  0:21 John W. Linville
2006-12-06  1:42 John W. Linville
2006-12-07 10:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-11-15  1:29 Please pull 'upstream-fixes' " John W. Linville
2006-11-15  1:31 ` Please pull 'upstream' " John W. Linville
2006-11-28 19:13   ` John W. Linville
2006-11-08  4:58 Please pull 'upstream-fixes' " John W. Linville
2006-11-08  4:59 ` Please pull 'upstream' " John W. Linville
2006-11-08 19:48   ` John W. Linville
2006-11-14 15:29   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-10-17 21:34 Please pull 'upstream-fixes' " John W. Linville
2006-10-17 21:35 ` Please pull 'upstream' " John W. Linville
2006-10-21 18:22   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-11 23:58 Please pull 'upstream-fixes' " John W. Linville
2006-09-11 23:59 ` Please pull 'upstream' " John W. Linville
2006-09-12 15:43   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-09-12 19:49   ` Michael Buesch
2006-08-30 15:05 John W. Linville
2006-09-06 15:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-14 20:50 John W. Linville
2006-07-28  0:22 Please pull 'upstream-fixes' " John W. Linville
2006-07-28  0:23 ` Please pull 'upstream' " John W. Linville
2006-07-29  4:33   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-07-10 21:29 Please pull 'upstream-fixes' " John W. Linville
2006-07-10 21:31 ` Please pull 'upstream' " John W. Linville
2006-07-10 21:38   ` Michael Buesch
2006-07-10 21:58     ` Larry Finger
2006-07-19 17:51   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-06-26 21:25 John W. Linville
2006-06-27  2:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-06-27  2:27   ` Larry Finger
2006-06-27  3:50     ` Jeff Garzik
2006-06-27 13:30     ` Michael Buesch
2006-06-27 14:11       ` Jeff Garzik
2006-06-27 14:34         ` Larry Finger
2006-06-27 14:36         ` Michael Buesch
2006-06-27 16:10           ` Jeff Garzik
2006-06-27 16:23             ` Michael Buesch
2006-06-27 15:25         ` Michael Buesch
2006-06-27 16:12           ` Jeff Garzik
2006-06-27 16:31             ` Michael Buesch
2006-06-27 19:33               ` John W. Linville
2006-06-27 19:47                 ` Michael Buesch
2006-06-27 20:06                   ` Larry Finger
2006-06-27 20:23                     ` Michael Buesch
2006-06-27 20:37                       ` Larry Finger
2006-06-28 14:34                         ` Michael Buesch
2006-06-28 16:04                           ` Larry Finger
2006-06-28 16:32                             ` Michael Buesch
2006-06-28 17:32                               ` Larry Finger
2006-06-28 18:02                                 ` Michael Buesch
2006-06-27 16:52             ` Joseph Jezak
2006-06-15 20:03 John W. Linville
2006-06-20  8:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-06-05 21:53 Please pull 'upstream-fixes' " John W. Linville
2006-06-05 21:55 ` Please pull 'upstream' " John W. Linville
2006-06-08 19:48   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-22 19:18 Please pull 'upstream-fixes' " John W. Linville
2006-05-22 19:19 ` Please pull 'upstream' " John W. Linville
2006-05-24  4:35   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-24 12:42     ` John W. Linville
2006-05-17 19:34 Please pull 'upstream-fixes' " John W. Linville
2006-05-17 19:38 ` Please pull 'upstream' " John W. Linville
2006-05-17 21:23   ` Daniel Drake
2006-05-18 17:28     ` John W. Linville
2006-05-18 18:26       ` Daniel Drake
2006-05-06  1:06 Please pull upstream-fixes " John W. Linville
2006-05-06  1:09 ` Please pull upstream " John W. Linville
2006-04-24 19:40 Please pull 'upstream-fixes' " John W. Linville
2006-04-24 20:40 ` Please pull 'upstream' " John W. Linville
2006-04-25  0:33   ` Dan Williams
2006-04-25 11:30     ` Johannes Berg
2006-04-25 12:03       ` Dan Williams
2006-04-26 10:18   ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070507233811.GB4245@tuxdriver.com \
    --to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).