From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcus Better Subject: Re: [PATCH] Intel IXP4xx network drivers v.2 - Ethernet and HSS Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 11:35:03 +0200 Message-ID: <200705091135.06405.marcus@better.se> References: <464034CF.20700@wpkg.org> <20070509092132.GB6976@xi.wantstofly.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2673490.JFVo1fev5x"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Lennert Buytenhek Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070509092132.GB6976@xi.wantstofly.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --nextPart2673490.JFVo1fev5x Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > Does that mean that the Debian ARM people have their heads so far > up their collective asses that they think that every form of change > is bad and are unable to accept that some forms of change might be > for the better? Well, I am not one of the Debian ARM people, just a user... and I do hope t= he=20 EABI port becomes supported in the future! But in the meatime there is a=20 crowd of users running Debian on consumer devices like the NSLU2, and they= =20 need a LE network driver. Marcus --nextPart2673490.JFVo1fev5x Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGQZXKXjXn6TzcAQkRAk4GAJ9+GT649/F0LihDlmA44wkC8H+pvQCfeULG v49XfAJSpJU0ZiNPRXjZ9G4= =1kK6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2673490.JFVo1fev5x--