netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	virtualization@lists.osdl.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
	Ian Pratt <ian.pratt@xensource.com>,
	Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@cl.cam.ac.uk>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Subject: Re: [1/2] [NET] link_watch: Move link watch list into net_device
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 15:14:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070510151426.d808384f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <464395E5.2090500@goop.org>

On Thu, 10 May 2007 15:00:05 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:

> Herbert Xu wrote:
> > [NET] link_watch: Move link watch list into net_device
> >
> > These days the link watch mechanism is an integral part of the
> > network subsystem as it manages the carrier status.  So it now
> > makes sense to allocate some memory for it in net_device rather
> > than allocating it on demand.
> 
> I think there's a problem with one of these two patches.  I've been
> noticing that one of my events/X threads has been going into a spin for
> about 5 mins after boot.  I added some debugging to
> kernel/workqueue.c:run_workqueue, since its that loop which seems to be
> spinning due to list corruption.
> 
> When I look to see if that loop has iterated for more than 100 times in
> one go (which seems unlikely),  I get this:
> 
> BUG: cpu 3, count=101 list screwup on c04babe4, func c03217e8
> func=linkwatch_event+0x0/0x2a
>  [<c0109173>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
>  [<c0109c7f>] show_trace+0x12/0x14
>  [<c0109d0c>] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
>  [<c0137c25>] run_workqueue+0x97/0x18c
>  [<c01386a4>] worker_thread+0xe5/0xf5
>  [<c013afe9>] kthread+0x3b/0x62
>  [<c0108d47>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
>  =======================
> 
> 
> I wonder if the problem is that the linkwatch_work is being rescheduled
> when its already been scheduled, or something like that?

Five minutes after boot is when jiffies wraps.  Are you sure it's
a list-screwup rather than a jiffy-wrap screwup?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-10 22:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20070504232051.411946839@goop.org>
2007-05-04 23:21 ` [patch 25/29] xen: Add the Xen virtual network device driver Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-05  9:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-05 10:05     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-05 10:23       ` Herbert Xu
2007-05-07 21:10         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-08 12:13           ` [1/2] [NET] link_watch: Move link watch list into net_device Herbert Xu
2007-05-08 12:16             ` [2/2] [NET] link_watch: Remove delay for up even when we're down Herbert Xu
2007-05-09  1:36               ` David Miller
2007-05-08 20:19             ` [1/2] [NET] link_watch: Move link watch list into net_device Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-09  1:49               ` Herbert Xu
2007-05-09  1:35             ` David Miller
2007-05-10 22:00             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-10 22:07               ` David Miller
2007-05-10 22:12                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-10 22:14               ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-05-10 22:22                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-10 22:25                   ` David Miller
2007-05-10 22:45                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-10 22:53                       ` Chris Wright
2007-05-10 22:53                       ` David Miller
2007-05-05 10:16     ` [patch 25/29] xen: Add the Xen virtual network device driver Rusty Russell
2007-05-07 21:11     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-07 22:35       ` Rusty Russell
2007-05-08  6:30         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-05-08  6:42           ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070510151426.d808384f.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=Christian.Limpach@cl.cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=ian.pratt@xensource.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).