From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
To: Michael Stone <mstone@mathom.us>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: skge vs sk98lin
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 09:01:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070514090130.1e3bb3f7@freepuppy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070514142024.GF1785@mathom.us>
On Mon, 14 May 2007 10:20:26 -0400
Michael Stone <mstone@mathom.us> wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:15:18AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >On Tue, 08 May 2007 08:00:36 -0400
> >Michael Stone <mstone@mathom.us> wrote:
> >> 2.6.21 seems to have fixed the stability issues I was seeing when using
> >> the skge driver with the older sk98xx dual port fiber cards. There is
> >> still one more lingering oddness: if I have *two* dual port cards in a
> >> system, say eth2-5, I see traffic on eth2, eth3, and eth5, but nothing
> >> on eth4. This seems to be consistent accross a couple of systems I've
> >> tested; only the first card's second interface sees packets (e.g., with
> >> tcpdump). If I reboot with the sk98lin driver on the same kernel I see
> >> all traffic, as expected.
> >
> >Are the statistics changing? ie. ethtool -S eth4 and ifconfig eth4
>
> Ok, I ran this for a lot longer and it seems less consistent than it did
> at first. It now appears that there is no correlation between a NIC not
> working and its order. In some cases the NICs both come up ok, and see
> traffic for a while. I left one example running over the weekend, and
> neither interface on one card was seeing traffic, and the interface
> counters weren't increasing. In another case, one interface on one NIC
> worked for a short period of time, then stopped. The interface counters
> would increase by a few packets every 30 seconds or so. Any kind of
> ethtool operation (e.g., ethtool -A eth4 autoneg off rx off tx off)
> would cause the interface to start seeing traffic again, then eventually
> go back to seeing only a few packets every few seconds.
>
> Mike Stone
Sounds like a missed interrupt getting the driver stuck. skge uses
NAPI and therefore needs level triggered irq's. What is the
contents of /proc/interrupts?
--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-14 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-08 12:00 skge vs sk98lin Michael Stone
2007-05-08 17:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-05-14 14:20 ` Michael Stone
2007-05-14 16:01 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070514090130.1e3bb3f7@freepuppy \
--to=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mstone@mathom.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).