From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [PATCH] netdev: lockdep classes in register_netdevice Re: [patch 04/13] ppp_generic: fix lockdep warning Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:05:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20070515100512.GA3050@ff.dom.local> References: <20070511.140309.59656886.davem@davemloft.net> <20070511141225.cf7a6909.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070514060700.GA1000@ff.dom.local> <20070513.233937.99203647.davem@davemloft.net> <20070515053101.GA990@ff.dom.local> <025c01c796cd$fe9ccee0$0202fea9@Jura> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , akpm@linux-foundation.org, jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org To: "Yuriy N\. Shkandybin" Return-path: Received: from mx10.go2.pl ([193.17.41.74]:51495 "EHLO poczta.o2.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759122AbXEOJ6j (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2007 05:58:39 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <025c01c796cd$fe9ccee0$0202fea9@Jura> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 12:49:47PM +0400, Yuriy N. Shkandybin wrote: > I've patched 2.6.22-rc1 and there was no warnings from lock debugger. > > Jura Many thanks, Jura! It seems reality is sometimes merciful... On the other hand I wonder, how all this could stay so long: a configuration similar to yours should be quite common. It looks, some people probably don't care, and here your help is even more precious! Best regards, Jarek P.