From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Make net watchdog timers 1 sec jiffy aligned
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 10:59:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070530105936.6c988da5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070529180112.GC5411@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
On Tue, 29 May 2007 11:01:13 -0700
Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> wrote:
> round_jiffies for net dev watchdog timer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
>
> Index: linux-2.6.22-rc-mm/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.22-rc-mm.orig/net/sched/sch_generic.c 2007-05-24 11:16:03.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.22-rc-mm/net/sched/sch_generic.c 2007-05-25 15:10:02.000000000 -0700
> @@ -224,7 +224,8 @@
> if (dev->tx_timeout) {
> if (dev->watchdog_timeo <= 0)
> dev->watchdog_timeo = 5*HZ;
> - if (!mod_timer(&dev->watchdog_timer, jiffies + dev->watchdog_timeo))
> + if (!mod_timer(&dev->watchdog_timer,
> + round_jiffies(jiffies + dev->watchdog_timeo)))
> dev_hold(dev);
> }
> }
Please cc netdev on net patches.
Again, I worry that if people set the watchdog timeout to, say, 0.1 seconds
then they will get one second, which is grossly different.
And if they were to set it to 1.5 seconds, they'd get 2.0 which is pretty
significant, too.
next parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-30 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070529180112.GC5411@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
2007-05-30 17:59 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-05-30 18:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] Make net watchdog timers 1 sec jiffy aligned Stephen Hemminger
2007-05-30 18:42 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-30 19:15 ` Venki Pallipadi
2007-05-30 19:32 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-30 19:55 ` David Miller
2007-05-30 20:30 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-05-30 21:35 ` Venki Pallipadi
2007-05-31 10:36 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-30 21:10 ` Venki Pallipadi
2007-05-30 22:10 ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-30 22:29 ` David Miller
2007-05-30 22:36 ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-30 23:02 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070530105936.6c988da5.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).