From: KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@balabit.hu>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: ja@ssi.bg, kaber@trash.net, horms@verge.net.au,
jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [IPV4] LVS: Allow to send ICMP unreachable responses when real-servers are removed
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 11:38:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705301138.29582@nienna> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070518.020525.28394540.davem@davemloft.net>
Hi,
On Friday 18 May 2007 11:05, David Miller wrote:
> From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
> Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 11:40:54 +0300 (EEST)
>
> > On Thu, 17 May 2007, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > > In any case some better solution than the current one needs to be
> > > found, allowing users to send spoofed packets is far worse than
> > > using a non-desired source address for ICMP packets.
> >
> > yes, I would prefer the sysctl_ip_nonlocal_bind change to be
> > removed until such solution is found.
>
> Ok, I'll revert it.
I'm just about to publish the next round of tproxy patches (with the
routing code modifications completely removed), but this issue is still
present.
I've posted a few patches making omitting this check possible
selectively back in March. Do those changes look acceptable?
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=117310979823297&w=3
And the related socket layer changes:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=117310979815374&w=3
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=117310979902806&w=3
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=117310980027541&w=3
--
Regards,
Krisztian Kovacs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-30 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200704271705.l3RH5Brw026873@hera.kernel.org>
2007-05-14 10:21 ` [IPV4] LVS: Allow to send ICMP unreachable responses when real-servers are removed Patrick McHardy
2007-05-14 10:35 ` David Miller
2007-05-14 14:25 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2007-05-14 14:32 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-14 15:49 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2007-05-14 17:41 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-15 5:26 ` Simon Horman
2007-05-15 9:46 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2007-05-15 16:11 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-15 23:41 ` Julian Anastasov
2007-05-17 11:25 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2007-05-17 16:41 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-17 16:40 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-05-17 20:51 ` David Miller
2007-05-18 1:06 ` Simon Horman
2007-05-18 8:40 ` Julian Anastasov
2007-05-18 9:05 ` David Miller
2007-05-30 9:38 ` KOVACS Krisztian [this message]
2007-05-31 0:21 ` Julian Anastasov
2007-05-31 12:50 ` KOVACS Krisztian
2007-05-31 23:18 ` Julian Anastasov
2007-06-01 12:55 ` KOVACS Krisztian
2007-06-20 10:57 ` Balazs Scheidler
2007-06-21 7:56 ` Julian Anastasov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200705301138.29582@nienna \
--to=hidden@balabit.hu \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).