From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [RFC RTNETLINK 03/09]: Split up rtnl_setlink Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:41:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20070605.124107.122833220.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20070605141250.15650.47178.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20070605141255.15650.74711.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, socketcan@hartkopp.net, hadi@cyberus.ca, xemul@sw.ru, ebiederm@xmission.com, tgraf@suug.ch To: kaber@trash.net Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:54585 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763121AbXFETkw (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 15:40:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070605141255.15650.74711.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Patrick McHardy Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:12:55 +0200 (MEST) > [RTNETLINK]: Split up rtnl_setlink > > Split up rtnl_setlink into a function performing validation and a function > performing the actual changes. This allows to share the modifcation logic > with rtnl_newlink, which is introduced by the next patch. > > Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy This looks fine to me.