From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: [PATCH] Virtual ethernet tunnel
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20070606.134959.93210257.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <4666CEAA.8010903@openvz.org>
	<20070606.124758.85411179.davem@davemloft.net>
	<46671B33.60907@fr.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: xemul@openvz.org, containers@lists.osdl.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, kaber@trash.net, dev@openvz.org
To: dlezcano@fr.ibm.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:58774
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934934AbXFFUtn (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 6 Jun 2007 16:49:43 -0400
In-Reply-To: <46671B33.60907@fr.ibm.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 22:38:11 +0200

> Perhaps, a name like "epipe" or "npipe", which reflects what does the 
> device, is more appropriate ?

'npipe' (Network PIPE) or 'epipe' (Ethernet PIPE) are fine with me.