From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Buesch Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] b44: timer power saving Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 10:37:37 +0200 Message-ID: <200706071037.37522.mb@bu3sch.de> References: <20070604202536.503165465@linux-foundation.org> <200706062101.20643.mb@bu3sch.de> <20070606140407.73a4aa3b@oldman> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gary Zambrano , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from static-ip-62-75-166-246.inaddr.intergenia.de ([62.75.166.246]:51174 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751182AbXFGIiQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 04:38:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070606140407.73a4aa3b@oldman> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 06 June 2007 23:04:07 Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > I don't think we need +1, if you need to fire immediately > > (on the next tick). The timer core will always fire > > timers that are in the past immediately. > > Thanks, but is it worth bothering to change it again? No, I don't think so. I just wanted to point that out. -- Greetings Michael.