From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] NET: Multiqueue network device support. Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:02:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20070612.140240.00078635.davem@davemloft.net> References: <466DEF9D.9070509@trash.net> <1181615384.4071.121.camel@localhost> <466E9DF2.9010505@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: hadi@cyberus.ca, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org, auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com To: kaber@trash.net Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:35688 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750801AbXFLVCZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:02:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <466E9DF2.9010505@trash.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Patrick McHardy Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:21:54 +0200 > So how do we move forward? We're going to put hw multiqueue support in, all of this discussion has been pointless, I just watch this thread and basically laugh at the resistence to hw multiqueue support :-)