From: Dan Aloni <da-x@monatomic.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix race condition about network device name allocation
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:07:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070614060738.GA10095@localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070613093631.42a45916@localhost>
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:36:31AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:45:21 +0300
> Dan Aloni <da-x@monatomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 08:58:40AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > Kenji Kaneshige found this race between device removal and
> > > registration. On unregister it is possible for the old device to
> > > exist, because sysfs file is still open. A new device with 'eth%d'
> > > will select the same name, but sysfs kobject register will fial.
> > >
> > > The following changes the shutdown order slightly. It hold a removes the sysfs
> > > entries earlier (on unregister_netdevice), but holds a kobject reference.
> > > Then when todo runs the actual last put free happens.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
> >
> > That patch breaks the bonding driver. After reverting it I avoid this crash:
> >
>[..]
> >
>
> I assume this happens when bonded slave device is removed?
Yes, it's just a simple removal via sysfs.
> Which kernel version?
2.6.21.5
--
Dan Aloni
XIV LTD, http://www.xivstorage.com
da-x (at) monatomic.org, dan (at) xiv.co.il
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-14 6:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-11 5:40 [BUG][PATCH] Fix race condition about network device name allocation Kenji Kaneshige
2007-05-11 15:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-05-11 16:25 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-05-14 1:33 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2007-05-14 15:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-05-14 8:17 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2007-05-14 15:58 ` [PATCH] " Stephen Hemminger
2007-06-13 9:45 ` Dan Aloni
2007-06-13 16:36 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-06-14 6:07 ` Dan Aloni [this message]
2007-06-13 22:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-06-14 4:36 ` Jay Vosburgh
2007-06-19 15:23 ` Why is this patch not in 2.6.22-rc5? Stephen Hemminger
2007-06-19 17:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-06-19 18:12 ` [PATCH] bonding: Fix use after free in unregister path Jay Vosburgh
2007-06-20 23:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-06-21 0:09 ` Chris Wright
2007-06-19 22:04 ` Why is this patch not in 2.6.22-rc5? David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070614060738.GA10095@localdomain \
--to=da-x@monatomic.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox