netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi@daemonizer.de>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Cc: John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Gary Zambrano <zambrano@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] b44-ssb: Fix IRQ routing bits on the backplane
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:21:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200706171721.56192.maxi@daemonizer.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706171452.38383.mb@bu3sch.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1585 bytes --]

On Sunday 17 June 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
> The backplane on the b44 chip seems to have a silicon bug
> in the IRQ routing. The ethernet core IRQ routing does not work
> with the routing bit returned from the backplaneflag register.
> This patch adds a workaround for the b44 chip to use a hardcoded
> constant. This constant was also used in the old b44 driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
> Cc: Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi@daemonizer.de>
> Cc: Gary Zambrano <zambrano@broadcom.com>

Tested-by: Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi@daemonizer.de>

>
> Index: bu3sch-wireless-dev/drivers/ssb/driver_pcicore.c
> ===================================================================
> --- bu3sch-wireless-dev.orig/drivers/ssb/driver_pcicore.c	2007-06-17
> 13:35:45.000000000 +0200 +++
> bu3sch-wireless-dev/drivers/ssb/driver_pcicore.c	2007-06-17
> 14:19:05.000000000 +0200 @@ -496,9 +496,15 @@ int
> ssb_pcicore_dev_irqvecs_enable(struc
>  		u32 intvec;
>
>  		intvec = ssb_read32(pdev, SSB_INTVEC);
> -		tmp = ssb_read32(dev, SSB_TPSFLAG);
> -		tmp &= SSB_TPSFLAG_BPFLAG;
> -		intvec |= tmp;
> +		if ((bus->chip_id & 0xFF00) == 0x4400) {
> +			/* Workaround: On the BCM44XX the BPFLAG routing
> +			 * bit is wrong. Use a hardcoded constant. */
> +			intvec |= 0x00000002;
> +		} else {
> +			tmp = ssb_read32(dev, SSB_TPSFLAG);
> +			tmp &= SSB_TPSFLAG_BPFLAG;
> +			intvec |= tmp;
> +		}
>  		ssb_write32(pdev, SSB_INTVEC, intvec);
>  	}
>
>
> Please apply this to wireless-dev.
> This is also most likely the bug Uwe Bugla was
> bullshitting about^W^Wreporting.

Maxi

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2007-06-17 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-17 12:52 [PATCH] b44-ssb: Fix IRQ routing bits on the backplane Michael Buesch
2007-06-17 15:21 ` Maximilian Engelhardt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200706171721.56192.maxi@daemonizer.de \
    --to=maxi@daemonizer.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zambrano@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).