From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: Multiqueue and virtualization WAS(Re: [PATCH 3/3] NET: [SCHED] Qdisc changes and sch_rr added for multiqueue Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 21:35:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20070629.213503.34601850.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1183121670.5188.16.camel@localhost> <20070629.143102.88475921.davem@davemloft.net> <1183167053.5153.7.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kaber@trash.net, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org, auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com To: hadi@cyberus.ca Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:46652 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751274AbXF3Een (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2007 00:34:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1183167053.5153.7.camel@localhost> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: jamal Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 21:30:53 -0400 > On Fri, 2007-29-06 at 14:31 -0700, David Miller wrote: > > Maybe for the control node switch, yes, but not for the guest network > > devices. > > And that is precisely what i was talking about - and i am sure thats how > the discussion with Patrick was. Awesome, but let's concentrate on the client since I can actually implement and test anything we come up with :-)