From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"David S\. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Re: [NETPOLL] netconsole: fix soft lockup when removing module
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 09:52:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070702075226.GB1639@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070701173558.GA207@tv-sign.ru>
>From my recent patch:
> > #1
> > Until kernel ver. 2.6.21 (including) cancel_rearming_delayed_work()
> > required a work function should always (unconditionally) rearm with
> > delay > 0 - otherwise it would endlessly loop. This patch replaces
> > this function with cancel_delayed_work(). Later kernel versions don't
> > require this, so here it's only for uniformity.
But Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> found:
> But 2.6.22 doesn't need this change, why it was merged?
>
> In fact, I suspect this change adds a race,
...
His description was right (thanks), so this patch reverts #1.
Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
---
diff -Nurp 2.6.22-rc7-/net/core/netpoll.c 2.6.22-rc7/net/core/netpoll.c
--- 2.6.22-rc7-/net/core/netpoll.c 2007-07-02 09:03:27.000000000 +0200
+++ 2.6.22-rc7/net/core/netpoll.c 2007-07-02 09:32:34.000000000 +0200
@@ -72,8 +72,7 @@ static void queue_process(struct work_st
netif_tx_unlock(dev);
local_irq_restore(flags);
- if (atomic_read(&npinfo->refcnt))
- schedule_delayed_work(&npinfo->tx_work, HZ/10);
+ schedule_delayed_work(&npinfo->tx_work, HZ/10);
return;
}
netif_tx_unlock(dev);
@@ -786,7 +785,7 @@ void netpoll_cleanup(struct netpoll *np)
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&npinfo->refcnt)) {
skb_queue_purge(&npinfo->arp_tx);
skb_queue_purge(&npinfo->txq);
- cancel_delayed_work(&npinfo->tx_work);
+ cancel_rearming_delayed_work(&npinfo->tx_work);
flush_scheduled_work();
/* clean after last, unfinished work */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-02 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070701173558.GA207@tv-sign.ru>
2007-07-02 6:34 ` [NETPOLL] netconsole: fix soft lockup when removing module Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-02 9:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-02 11:08 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-02 7:52 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2007-07-02 8:59 ` [PATCH] " Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-02 10:12 ` [PATCH 2/2][NETPOLL] netconsole: delete flush_scheduled_work Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-04 6:41 ` [PATCH] Re: [NETPOLL] netconsole: fix soft lockup when removing module Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-04 6:47 ` David Miller
2007-07-04 7:08 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-04 7:21 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070702075226.GB1639@ff.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).