From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [NETPOLL] netconsole: fix soft lockup when removing module
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 13:24:08 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070702092408.GA137@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070702063424.GA1639@ff.dom.local>
On 07/02, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>
> > > --- a/net/core/netpoll.c
> > > +++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
> > > @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ static void queue_process(struct work_struct *work)
> > > netif_tx_unlock(dev);
> > > local_irq_restore(flags);
> > >
> > > - schedule_delayed_work(&npinfo->tx_work, HZ/10);
> > > + if (atomic_read(&npinfo->refcnt))
> > > + schedule_delayed_work(&npinfo->tx_work, HZ/10);
> > > return;
> > > }
>
> [...snip...]
>
> So, 2.6.21 needs something better (maybe you've found it btw.?),
> but they weren't too interested, anyway.
We can do a double flush trick. If queue_process() checks ->refcnt before
schedule_delayed_work() like above, netpoll_cleanup() can do
flush_scheduled_work();
// the next invocation of queue_process()
// must see ->refcnt == 0
if (!cancel_delayed_work(&npinfo->tx_work)) {
/* may be queued, wait for completion */
flush_scheduled_work();
}
Jarek, I don't understand net/, a silly question. Why do we need the #2 chunk?
Isn't it better to move skb_queue_purge(&npinfo->txq) after cancel_..._work()
instead?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-02 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070701173558.GA207@tv-sign.ru>
2007-07-02 6:34 ` [NETPOLL] netconsole: fix soft lockup when removing module Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-02 9:24 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2007-07-02 11:08 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-02 7:52 ` [PATCH] " Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-02 8:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-02 10:12 ` [PATCH 2/2][NETPOLL] netconsole: delete flush_scheduled_work Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-04 6:41 ` [PATCH] Re: [NETPOLL] netconsole: fix soft lockup when removing module Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-04 6:47 ` David Miller
2007-07-04 7:08 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-07-04 7:21 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070702092408.GA137@tv-sign.ru \
--to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).