netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas)
To: Akira Tsukamoto <akirat@rd.scei.sony.co.jp>
Cc: Masakazu Mokuno <mokuno@sm.sony.co.jp>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] ps3: gigabit ethernet driver for PS3, take3
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:53:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070709185327.GI4457@austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070709102243.03C0.AKIRAT@rd.scei.sony.co.jp>

On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 10:50:19AM +0900, Akira Tsukamoto wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:02:41 -0500, linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas) mentioned: 
> > of the spidernet device driver.  Please note that the old
> > spidernet had absolutely disasterous performance for transmit;
> > it also had a variety of crazy hangs and lockups under 
> > high-stress conditions; or NFS operation, or certain back-to-back
> > tcp usage scenarios. A few dozen bugfixes went in since
> > the time that the gelic snapshot was taken.
> 
> I think we know the problems of old spidernet issues, we uses QS20 also 
> in our lab.
> Current gelic has fixed them all separated from your work and it have no 
> remaining issues or performance problem.
> In our measurement, PS3 network performance is better than IBM QS20 right
> now.

!! Well, gee, I wish this plan had been made public. I'd spent something
between 3-6 months working full-time on spidernet issues. This was a lot
of work and effort.  Worse, this was *not* my main job; it was rather to 
help the neighbors prevent a disaster in the making.  Certainly, I would 
not have spent any time on this, if I'd known someone else was also working 
to fix the same bugs. :-(

> I totally understand difficultness of your effort that fixing spidernet 
> without decent documentation which we have, but the changes we made was 
> significantly large as you see if you diff gelic driver with current 
> spidernet driver (totally different), 

The differences are very large, because very large changes have been made
to the spidernet. However, a diff between gelic and the old spidernet is
much smaller.  So I'm somewhat confused by this.  Perhaps I am mistaken, 
and should read the code more carefully.

> so the conclusion of discussion at 
> 3C common-linux wg (Sony, IBM and Toshiba) 

?? What working group is this?  This is the first time that I am hearing
of it, and, as the only active spidernet maintainer, I'd hope to have
been a part of suc discussion. Oh well.

-- Linas Vepstas

      reply	other threads:[~2007-07-09 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <468D2098.50507@austin.ibm.com>
2007-07-06 18:02 ` [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] ps3: gigabit ethernet driver for PS3, take3 Linas Vepstas
2007-07-09  1:50   ` Akira Tsukamoto
2007-07-09 18:53     ` Linas Vepstas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070709185327.GI4457@austin.ibm.com \
    --to=linas@austin.ibm.com \
    --cc=akirat@rd.scei.sony.co.jp \
    --cc=cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=mokuno@sm.sony.co.jp \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).