netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* ethtool locking
@ 2007-07-11 10:58 Ben Dooks
  2007-07-11 15:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ben Dooks @ 2007-07-11 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux netdev

I am currently upgrading the DM9000 network driver to support
ethtool for items such as controlling the MII interface and
have the following question about locking with the ethtool
interface:

Most devices use an overall spinlock when changing the settings
such as in the 8139too.c driver:

static int rtl8139_set_settings(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_cmd *cmd)
{
	struct rtl8139_private *np = netdev_priv(dev);
	int rc;
	spin_lock_irq(&np->lock);
	rc = mii_ethtool_sset(&np->mii, cmd);
	spin_unlock_irq(&np->lock);
	return rc;
}

In the case of the DM9000, the phy read and write code
already has a spinlock in for hardware access.

Do I need any more locking for the MII calls other than
what is provided by the lower layer (IE, do these calls
need locking against anything else?)

-- 
Ben (ben@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)

  'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-11 15:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-11 10:58 ethtool locking Ben Dooks
2007-07-11 15:31 ` Stephen Hemminger

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).