From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH try#2] Blackfin ethernet driver: on chip ethernet MAC controller driver Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 11:53:58 +0100 Message-ID: <20070715105358.GA18177@infradead.org> References: <1184491629.3140.59.camel@roc-laptop> <200707151236.51779.mb@bu3sch.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: bryan.wu@analog.com, Mike Frysinger , Jeff Garzik , Andrew Morton , LKML , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Buesch Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200707151236.51779.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:36:51PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Sunday 15 July 2007 11:27:09 Bryan Wu wrote: > > +#if defined(CONFIG_BFIN_MAC_USE_L1) > > +# define bfin_mac_alloc(dma_handle, size) l1_data_sram_zalloc(size) > > +# define bfin_mac_free(dma_handle, ptr) l1_data_sram_free(ptr) > > +#else > > +# define bfin_mac_alloc(dma_handle, size) \ > > + dma_alloc_coherent(NULL, size, dma_handle, GFP_NORMAL) > > What is GFP_NORMAL? It's not defined in latest linus' tree. > I think you should use GFP_KERNEL, if you can sleep, or GFP_ATOMIC, > if you can't. Actually this whole thing looks fishy. There should be a struct device for the dma allocation, through a platform_device. And the CONFIG_BFIN_MAC_USE_L1 should go away, the l1 sram should have a dma provider so this can be handled through the dma api.