From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: [PATCH] [IrDA] Fix IrDA build failure Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:17:08 +0400 Message-ID: <20070716121708.GA24483@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <20070716111715.GB22757@mail.solidboot.com> <20070716115624.GA4492@2ka.mipt.ru> <20070716120744.GD3653@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Cc: Samuel Ortiz , davem@davemloft.net, eric.y.miao@gmail.com, sam@ravnborg.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, irda-users@lists.sourceforge.net, stable@kernel.org To: Adrian Bunk Return-path: Received: from relay.2ka.mipt.ru ([194.85.82.65]:43647 "EHLO 2ka.mipt.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758917AbXGPMUx (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:20:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070716120744.GD3653@stusta.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 02:07:44PM +0200, Adrian Bunk (bunk@stusta.de) wrote: > > What about having all of them __devinit/__devexit? > > That would be completely wrong. Hi Adrian. Then why should irda have __init/__exit at first point - replacing that with appropriate 'dev' prefix I suggested. -- Evgeniy Polyakov