From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [RFC 1/1] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 19:29:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20070721.192904.10298367.davem@davemloft.net> References: <200707201741.49290.ossthema@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, raisch@de.ibm.com, themann@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, meder@de.ibm.com, tklein@de.ibm.com, stefan.roscher@de.ibm.com, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru To: ossthema@de.ibm.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:52574 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750909AbXGVC3F (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jul 2007 22:29:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200707201741.49290.ossthema@de.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Jan-Bernd Themann Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 17:41:48 +0200 > Generic LRO patch > > Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann I have no general objections to this patch. However I'd like to see at least one or two uses of these APIs before we put it in, and it sounds as if we have at least two pending and in the works if not ready already, so that shouldn't be an issue. Thanks.