From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 03/12 -Rev2] dev.c changes. Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:44:28 +0400 Message-ID: <20070723104428.GC22877@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <20070722090457.7787.4601.sendpatchset@K50wks273871wss.in.ibm.com> <20070722090525.7787.10432.sendpatchset@K50wks273871wss.in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Cc: jagana@us.ibm.com, Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, gaagaan@gmail.com, kumarkr@linux.ibm.com, rdreier@cisco.com, mcarlson@broadcom.com, kaber@trash.net, jeff@garzik.org, general@lists.openfabrics.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, tgraf@suug.ch, hadi@cyberus.ca, davem@davemloft.net, mchan@broadcom.com, sri@us.ibm.com To: Krishna Kumar Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070722090525.7787.10432.sendpatchset@K50wks273871wss.in.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org Errors-To: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi Krishna. On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 02:35:25PM +0530, Krishna Kumar (krkumar2@in.ibm.com) wrote: > diff -ruNp org/net/core/dev.c rev2/net/core/dev.c > --- org/net/core/dev.c 2007-07-20 07:49:28.000000000 +0530 > +++ rev2/net/core/dev.c 2007-07-21 23:08:33.000000000 +0530 > @@ -875,6 +875,48 @@ void netdev_state_change(struct net_devi > } > } > > +/* > + * dev_change_tx_batching - Enable or disable batching for a driver that > + * supports batching. > + */ > +int dev_change_tx_batching(struct net_device *dev, unsigned long new_batch_skb) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + if (!dev->hard_start_xmit_batch) { > + /* Driver doesn't support skb batching */ > + ret = -ENOTSUPP; > + goto out; > + } > + > + /* Handle invalid argument */ > + if (new_batch_skb < 0) { > + ret = -EINVAL; > + goto out; > + } > + > + ret = 0; > + > + /* Check if new value is same as the current */ > + if (!!(dev->features & NETIF_F_BATCH_ON) == !!new_batch_skb) > + goto out; o_O Scratched head for too long before understood what it means :) > + spin_lock(&dev->queue_lock); > + if (new_batch_skb) { > + dev->features |= NETIF_F_BATCH_ON; > + dev->tx_queue_len >>= 1; > + } else { > + if (!skb_queue_empty(&dev->skb_blist)) > + skb_queue_purge(&dev->skb_blist); > + dev->features &= ~NETIF_F_BATCH_ON; > + dev->tx_queue_len <<= 1; > + } > + spin_unlock(&dev->queue_lock); Hmm, should this also stop interrupts? -- Evgeniy Polyakov