From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Resurrect napi_poll patch. Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:06:42 +0200 Message-ID: <20070723170642.GA13771@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20070720.223129.59470764.davem@davemloft.net> <20070723105822.3a9fa152@oldman.hamilton.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andi Kleen , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, jgarzik@pobox.com To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:41061 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755764AbXGWRGq (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:06:46 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070723105822.3a9fa152@oldman.hamilton.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 10:58:22AM +0100, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On 21 Jul 2007 15:26:00 +0200 > Andi Kleen wrote: > > > David Miller writes: > > > > > > Good candidates for taking advantage of multi-napi are: > > > > > > 1) e1000 > > > 2) ucc_geth > > > 3) ehea > > > 4) sunvnet > > > > s2io.c > > sky2.c could use it because of issues with dual-port that share > one napi for status. Sorry, I didn't parse the sentence. Did you mean "couldn't use it" ...? Also can you elaborate why it shouldn't work? -Andi