netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@linux-foundation.org,
	jgarzik@pobox.com, hadi@cyberus.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFX]: napi_struct V3
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:29:51 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070724.212951.70218044.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1185330794.1803.452.camel@localhost.localdomain>

From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:33:14 +1000

> Maybe by adding YA state bit?  Hold on, this might get ugly...
> 
> Say netif_rx_schedule_prep() sets the MORE_TODO bit (atomically instead
> of setting __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED) if it's going to fail, and
> netif_rx_complete() returns 0 if it was set, or 1 if it's OK.  Now
> callers do:
> 
> 	reenable_interrupts();
>         if (rx_pending() || !netif_rx_complete(netdev, napi))
>                 disable_interrupts();

This is an interesting idea, and would work, but the extra atomics
for something that 2 or 3 drivers actually need.... unless I
misunderstand your suggestion?

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-25  4:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-24  4:07 [PATCH RFX]: napi_struct V3 David Miller
2007-07-24  4:47 ` Rusty Russell
2007-07-24  5:47   ` David Miller
2007-07-24  6:21     ` Rusty Russell
2007-07-25  0:45       ` David Miller
2007-07-25  1:15         ` Rusty Russell
2007-07-25  1:47           ` David Miller
2007-07-25  2:33             ` Rusty Russell
2007-07-25  4:29               ` David Miller [this message]
2007-07-25  5:09                 ` Rusty Russell
2007-07-25  5:12                   ` David Miller
2007-07-25  5:10             ` David Miller
2007-07-24  7:12 ` Francois Romieu
2007-07-24  7:33   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-07-24  7:35   ` David Miller
2007-07-28 15:21 ` Roland Dreier
2007-07-29  5:30   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070724.212951.70218044.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).