From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [RFC 0/1] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:28:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20070725.172813.03082027.davem@davemloft.net> References: <200707201741.45079.ossthema@de.ibm.com> <46A785C2.9090708@myri.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ossthema@de.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, raisch@de.ibm.com, themann@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, meder@de.ibm.com, tklein@de.ibm.com, stefan.roscher@de.ibm.com, jeff@garzik.org, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru To: gallatin@myri.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:54994 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751591AbXGZA2O (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:28:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <46A785C2.9090708@myri.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Andrew Gallatin Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:17:54 -0400 > I've ported myri10ge to use the new LRO interface. I have attached a > preliminary patch to myri10ge. I'm very pleased to note that the > performance is on-par with my own LRO used by our out-of-tree driver. > (except when using mixed MTUS, see performance data below). Thanks for posting this port and feedback on the generic LRO code.