From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] SFQ: backport some features from ESFQ
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 00:19:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20070729.001947.122615957.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <11856929352537-git-send-email-bugfood-ml@fatooh.org>
	<46AC3EFB.6040504@fatooh.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: bugfood-ml@fatooh.org
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:39386
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759070AbXG2HTr (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 03:19:47 -0400
In-Reply-To: <46AC3EFB.6040504@fatooh.org>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@fatooh.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 00:17:15 -0700

> Corey Hickey wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > This set of patches adds some of ESFQ's modifications to the original 
> > SFQ. Thus far, I have received support for this approach rather than for 
> > trying to get ESFQ included as a separate qdisc.
> 
> Crud; I wasn't expecting git-send-email to thread the messages that way. 
> I guess I should have used --no-chain-reply-to. If I ought re-send this 
> series with that option, somebody please say the word and I'll do so.

It's not necessary, let some feedback come in first.