From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
shemminger@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Fix sk_buff page offsets and lengths.
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:52:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070731105215.b7e1044c.dada1@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070730.185028.26532012.davem@davemloft.net>
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:50:28 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell pointed out to me that the skb_frag_struct
> is broken on platforms using 64K or larger page sizes, it
> even generates warnings when (for example) the myri10ge driver
> tries to assign PAGE_SIZE into frag->size.
>
> I've thus increased page offset and size to __u32 in the patch below.
>
> I made this change much to even my own chagrin, but this is the
> most direct fix and the ifdefs we could put here are both ugly
> and also not something that we do with struct scatterlist so
> no reason to do it in a place like this.
>
> Actually, the cost on 64-bit is zero because there existed 4 bytes of
> alignment padding for skb_frag_struct because of the page pointer.
> On 32-bit the cost is up to 64-bytes :-/
>
> Stephen, this opens up the doors a bit for the scatterlist work
> you wanted to do in sk_buff.
>
Ouch...
sizeof(struct skb_shared_info) is enlarged by 18*4 bytes on i386, a litle bit more than 64 bytes :(
I understand ifdefs are ugly, but in the common case (PAGE_SIZE<64K), this change seems very unfortunate.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-01 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-31 1:50 [PATCH]: Fix sk_buff page offsets and lengths David Miller
2007-07-31 8:52 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2007-08-01 20:44 ` David Miller
2007-07-31 10:20 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-07-31 12:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-31 14:00 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070731105215.b7e1044c.dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).