From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC]: napi_struct V5 Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 13:50:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20070806.135047.55149298.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20070805.232423.21363072.davem@davemloft.net> <1551EAE59135BE47B544934E30FC4FC002AABA1D@nt-irva-0751.brcm.ad.broadcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@linux-foundation.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, hadi@cyberus.ca, rusty@rustcorp.com.au To: mchan@broadcom.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:55523 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761318AbXHFUus (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2007 16:50:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1551EAE59135BE47B544934E30FC4FC002AABA1D@nt-irva-0751.brcm.ad.broadcom.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: "Michael Chan" Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:00:45 -0700 > David Miller wrote: > > > 4) NETPOLL put hopefully into a working state. > > It's no longer necessary to change the tx locking scheme > in bnx2.c and tg3.c, right? May be you forgot to revert > the tx locking changes you did in V4? Right, I'll fix that up, thanks for catching it.