From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [patch (take 2)] genirq: fix simple and fasteoi irq handlers Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 08:14:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20070806061459.GA26046@elte.hu> References: <20070726081326.GA3197@ff.dom.local> <1185437431.3227.21.camel@chaos> <20070726083120.GA26910@elte.hu> <20070726085523.GA3423@ff.dom.local> <20070726091254.GA8063@elte.hu> <4bacf17f0707300029g5116e70bq4808059dc8b069f1@mail.gmail.com> <20070731155843.GA7033@elte.hu> <46B20E47.6020403@googlemail.com> <20070802201126.GA27000@elte.hu> <20070806060723.GA981@ff.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Gabriel C , Linus Torvalds , Thomas Gleixner , Jean-Baptiste Vignaud , linux-kernel , shemminger , linux-net , netdev , Andrew Morton , Alan Cox , marcin.slusarz@gmail.com To: Jarek Poplawski Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070806060723.GA981@ff.dom.local> Sender: linux-net-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org * Jarek Poplawski wrote: > Subject: genirq: fix simple and fasteoi irq handlers > > After the "genirq: do not mask interrupts by default" patch interrupts > should be disabled not immediately upon request, but after they > happen. But, handle_simple_irq() and handle_fasteoi_irq() can skip > this once or more if an irq is just serviced (IRQ_INPROGRESS), > possibly disrupting a driver's work. nice fix. I think this is exactly the type of bug we were hoping to be able to identify and fix, and it could explain the regression in its entirety. The big question - does it fix Marcin's regression? Ingo