From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4][SSB] EXTIF serial port initialization
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:51:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708061051.05769.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070806002117.GJ2469@ghostprotocols.net>
On Monday 06 August 2007, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 01:19:59AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno escreveu:
> > The patch below against 2.6.23-rc1-mm2 implements EXTIF serial
> > initialization, currently marked as TODO.
> >
> > It originally comes from the OpenWrt patches.
>
> Comments below
>
> > Cc: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
> >
> > --- a/drivers/ssb/driver_mipscore.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ssb/driver_mipscore.c
> > @@ -128,51 +128,52 @@
> > ssb_write32(mdev, SSB_IPSFLAG, irqflag);
> > }
> >
> > -/* XXX: leave here or move into separate extif driver? */
> > -static int ssb_extif_serial_init(struct ssb_device *dev, struct ssb_serial_ports *ports)
> > +static inline bool serial_exists(u8 *regs)
> > {
> > + u8 save_mcr, msr = 0;
>
> Why declare save_mcr here...
>
> >
> > + if (regs) {
>
> if it is just used here?
There is almost never an advantage when declaring variables at the beginning
of a statement block instead of the function start.
The only thing you "gain" is that you don't easily see anymore how much
stackspace is used by the funtions.
So I really suggest to declare variables at the beginning of functions,
except for some rare circumstances maybe. Which is not the case here.
But anyway. Just saw this: Drop the inline statement. There is no
need to inline this function.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-06 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-05 23:19 [PATCH 2/4][SSB] EXTIF serial port initialization Aurelien Jarno
2007-08-06 0:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2007-08-06 8:51 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2007-08-06 13:14 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2007-08-06 8:43 ` Michael Buesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200708061051.05769.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
--cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).